Muammar Al Khadafi

Back in 2008, then Communities Secretary Hazel Blears, told a Select Committee that 1/4 of Boston, Lincolnshire's 70,000 population were Eastern Europeans.

Amazingly, for a small town, 65 different languages were said to be spoken at the time.

Enrichment continues. Fast forward a little to the present day and we see a transformed town, no longer an English town, but a town of which parts all but belong to other nations and peoples.

You've Polish shops - even the local Tescos added a Polish aisle in response to demand - Russian Shops, Ukranian Shops, and a school staffed with support workers to deal with all the different languages.

Along with that, there are plenty of tales of drunken Eastern Europeans urinating in public, and of being able to walk through the town and come across next to nobody who speaks English.

The inevitable happens, with locals made to feel foreigners in their own community, elbowed out by a mass influx of outsiders. Part of Britain ceases to be Britain.

Hand in hand goes the obvious lowering of wages, and loss of jobs to the immigrant workers. One could fairly say that mass immigration creates a low wage nation of poverty and tenuous job security.

Locals find themselves jobless, wages decline, the only ones to benefit are the immigrants and the employers, local people pay the price.

Is it any wonder that the British are upset, and that Boston is predicted to see a huge march protesting against mass immigration and immigrant workers in November of this year?

A Facebook page to support the march has already attracted thousands of supporters.

Organiser Dean Everitt told the Boston Standard that "Everybody in Boston is fed up with the migrant workers. The town is not the place I grew up in. We are local town people and we are fed up of being second class citizens in our own town. The British person is being discriminated against in their own country".

Council Leader Peter Bedford (Tory) said that "Freedom of movement means that EU citizens have a legal right to be here. They come to work. Boston Borough Council works hard to deal with the issues their presence has generated. We continue to work hard with the migrant workers, their families, community groups and other partner agencies to aid successful integration and to deal with the pressure which such large numbers have presented".

Says it all really, integration is what counts, the feelings of locals left strangers in an English town, with lower wages and jobs being snapped up by migrants, don't figure in officialdoms thinking.

The British people don't matter. It's never said outright, but you can see it plain as day in the words and deeds of those in charge.

We're it half of our MP's suddenly shoved out of a job, or reduced to minimum wage, because an army of Poles arrived to take over, or many of the council fatcats shoved out in favour of some Latvians who'd do the job for peanuts, there'd be action taken swiftly.

It's just the rest of us though, those running the show aren't suffering. It's easy for them to pontificate about the glories of free movement of labour, enrichment, integration, and all the rest of it, when it is us left paying the price.

Boston, like so many other places in this land of ours, have ceased to be Britain, and the British people are finding themselves pushed out more and more. Dare to complain and you're racist.

It's the reality which free movement of labour and mass immigration brings - lower wages, less jobs for the British, and the British people shoved aside.

Strangers in our own land, alienated from opportunity, and ignored by those who supposedly stand elected to represent Britain, is the lot of the British people now.

Unless we stand up for ourselves and do something about it then this journey to exclusion and outcast status in our own nation will continue.

Boston is a picture of all Britains future in miniature unless we act now.

David Levin, vice chair of the Headmasters and Headmistresses Conference (HMC), who grew up in South Africa under the apartheid system, has warned that schools in London are 'sleepwalking' into segregation, where some classrooms are exclusively black or Asian.

Mentioned was Stepney Green School, East London, where 97% of pupils are of Bangladeshi heritage.

It's an interesting point, but it isn't a surprise, we all already knew it was happening, and it's not just in schools.

The schools are representative of what happens across the capital, and elsewhere, where we see parallel foreign populations, not the integration that politicians always prattle on about.

The schools are our future, we can see it around us now, but when all these kids grow up they'll join their segregated lands, their foreign communities within our nation.

People do not come to Britain and become British, the evidence of our own eyes tells us that they come to Britain and transform parts of Britain into their homeland.

These parallel communities may overlap in places, but the simple truth is that they are separate communities, they are a part of Britain made foreign, and wishing to remain foreign. Birds of a feather flock together as the old saying goes.

Integration does not occur on any large scale, it was always the pipe dream of idiot politicians that it would.

The sheer size of foreign populations suddenly transplanted here, and the speed at which it happened (and is happening), guaranteed that illusions of integration were doomed to fail from the start.

Indeed, the only real integration going on is not foreign populations integrating with the British, but rather the British being forced to integrate with the demands of the foreign populations.

A nation which is no longer a nation, rather a series of enclaves for other nations, is the result which we see.

Should it continue to its inevitable conclusion then the obliteration of all that is British, and of the British people, is the result.

Minority seeks to become majority, it does it in small doses and confined spaces - that's no criticism, that is perfectly understandable and natural. It makes an area its own.

Only, minority met idiot Britain, which insists minority has to be appeased, that minority is right, that minority must retain its separate identity, and that the indigenous British must surrender their own identity in order to accommodate minority.

The creation of a Britain which is no more than a series of balkanised regions, or cantons, of disparate racial or religious groups, is the result, a state in which the indigenous are strangers on the periphery in their own land.

David Levin's comment on schools, whereas being interesting, is not truly accurate.

We did sleepwalk into segregation - only balkanisation or colonisation would be a more accurate term - and it's not a case of we're getting there, we already are there. And it is not in schools alone.

Schools are a picture of the society around us, a reflection of the present, and an echo of that which is to come.

Segregation is a misleading term, so is apartheid, what we have is the destruction of Britain as a state which has a national identity, and the creation of colony outposts.

We have, to put it simply, invasion. Our invaders are the entire world, and all are making a piece of us theirs.

At best we remain a nation on paper, there is no segregation, there is no apartheid - unless you count groups conspiring to dominate the local populace - there is simply disparate interests all grabbing their piece of the pie, and seeking to remain them whilst we cease to be us.

A collection of five studies on immigration, commissioned by the Labour party during their decade of destruction but buried because the findings were too controversial and potentially damaging, are finally to see the light of day in what could well be political dynamite which will destroy forever the official myths that we are not being colonised and that immigration in itself is beneficial to us.

Already leaked to the Telegraph, the snippets which they have published are already a savage indictment of let 'em all in Labours abject failings on immigration, and raise many questions about why they chose to conceal the truth from us.

Among revelations in the documents aired by the Telegraph, we find the conclusion that immigrants to Britain are more likely to be out of work than the native population, and far less likely to engage in any form of "civic participation".

Also, more than one third of Londons population has been born outside of the UK. One third of those living in our capital! And the politicians have the gall to tell us that we are not being colonised?

Migrants from Bulgaria and Romania are shown to be more likely to have four or more children - colonisation by the cradle again, placing huge strain on education, NHS, and the welfare state.

As with recent figures which have shown Polands population decline whilst the number of Poles in Britain increase, the reports show that the population of both Bulgaria and Romania also declined between 2004 to 2010. Need we tell you that at the same time the number of Bulgarians and Romanians in the UK increased astronomically?

Unsurprisingly, the obvious also happened - unemployment levels in Bulgaria and Romania fell, whereas in the UK they increased. Who could have guessed that is what will happen when you have too many people chasing too few jobs?

On which note, also shown by the reports, is the fact that Bulgarians and Romanians were more likely to claim unemployment benefits than either native Brits or other migrants groups in Britain.

And, what is the best that Labour can manage to say on the issue? Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper admits that Labour "got things wrong" on immigration.

Admitting you "got things wrong" is all fine and dandy, even though it is a huge understatement and does absolutely nothing to repair the damage which has been done to Britain.

Saying you should have done it differently, great help to us.

What are the Labour party going to do in order to undo and reverse the nightmare of mass immigration and overpopulation, along with the burdens that places on all of our critical services and national infrastructure?

Nothing, that's what. You got it wrong, and we're expected to live with it for ever more.

Many believe that Labour didn't get it wrong by accident, there was design there. Whatever the truth, the Labour legacy is an overcrowded nation flooded with immigrants, and it is a legacy which - despite Camerons tough talking - ConDem has carried on.

Getting it wrong just doesn't cut it one bit, politicians seem to get it wrong all too often, and it is always us and Britain left paying the price.

Instead of just holding up hands with a weak "we got it wrong" and not even the decency to offer a true apology, how about admitting to the full extent of just how you got it wrong, the damage which that has caused, and then actually doing something that will put it right for once?

No, of course not, your wrongs are something the rest of us will be paying the price of for a long time, and you'll just expect us to lump it and accept a half hearted semi apology in the way of penitence.

Our society has been changed forever as a result of your getting it wrong, and the process of change is ongoing - and it isn't change for the better.

Labour was, and is, a disaster for Britain - and sadly, as we are finding out currently, Tory and Liberal are no better.

Not only have all of them got it wrong, they all continue to get it wrong. We can see with our own eyes that Britain and Britains future is not safe in any of their hands.

Whichever of them is in power Britain will continues its journey towards overpopulated and colonised land, and by way of an excuse we'll get no more than a "we got things wrong" from the lot of them.

Many times we don't even get that feeble excuse though, normally it's point at one of the other parties and tell us that "they got it wrong".

As they make excuses and trade blame, and do nothing in the way of fixing things, the colonisation of our Britain continues.


*We'll bring you an update and complete analysis once the full studies are published.

Todays Daily Mail has a very interesting investigation of polygamous marriage within the UK - aka bigamy that authorities turn a blind eye to, and fund via the benefits system simply because of who it is committing the bigamy.

"Although the Government says there are only 1,000 such bigamous or polygamous unions in the UK, two experienced Lancashire social workers — one of Indian-English heritage and the other with Pakistani origins — told me that, although it’s difficult to be precise, in their estimation the figure is closer to 20,000."

20,000! And we're funding that, treating them as single mothers and paying for our own colonisation.

"To avoid breaking Britain’s matrimony laws, the men marry their extra ‘wives’ in an Islamic Nikah ceremony, either in their own homes or a mosque".

Of course, and our laws are stupid enough to allow that, and not to create new legislation to tackle it. It's all about who is doing it, not whether it is acceptable in Britain or not.

"Every single man of my age who I bump into seems to have a third, fourth or fifth wife. The issue is going unreported but in the Asian communities this is becoming a way of life. I think the number of polygamous relationships must be 20,000" says Tariq Ali, of Project BME.

Yes, it is going unreported, authority has no desire to admit to what is going on, to what is tacitly supported and endorsed via our benefits system and official indifference.

"Officially, bigamy and polygamy are punishable by up to seven years in prison. It was declared illegal in England and Wales in 1604, when the Parliament of James I took action to restrain ‘evil persons’ marrying more than one wife — on penalty of death. But officialdom now turns a blind eye because of cultural sensitivities".

It's always cultural sensitivities, otherwise known as thou shalt not dare challenge anything which Britains enriching minorities do, they are above and beyond the law, we must excuse their actions on the grounds of sensitivity and turn a blind eye every time.

Full story in the Daily Mail - what on earth has our Britain become, it is Britain no longer, it is a disparate mess of competing cultures who flout the law and societal norms with impunity.

The results of a poll carried out by Ipsos KMG, has revealed the interesting fact that 61% of Turks think that there are too many immigrants in their country.

Only 21% of those polled - and the survey was conducted in 24 countries including the USA and Germany - believed that immigrants have a positive effect on their country. In Turkey, only 6% of Turks polled believed immigrants had a positive effect on their country.

With Turkey heading for EU membership, vigorously supported by the likes of David Cameron, and many warning that should Turkey become a member the West will be swamped with Muslim immigrants, it's worth reflecting upon mass immigration and some simple truths around it.

For the most part - at least after a certain point/other than under some circumstances - countries wish to export people, not import them.

It's fine if their people go overseas and colonise someone elses land, but they do not wish to see their own nation become some foreign outpost where they are a minority.

There's nothing wrong with wanting to preserve your own culture, traditions, and race, it's a natural thing.

Of course, here in the West officialdom presents it differently. For some groups - such as the indigenous British - to wish to preserve themselves and their identity is labelled racist and xenophobic, other groups and nations we'll turn a blind eye to or even support.

The great hypocrisy of mass immigration is simply that many of the non-Western countries who believe that their own people should be free to move wherever, do so only until they are on the receiving end of huge influxes of people foreign to them and all of the attendant problems that brings.

They will swamp other nations with their people, but they do not want to see their own nation swamped with outsiders.

Some nations export people, some import them. Most of the exporters are wise enough to realise that mass immigration is only a good thing when they are not the ones whose nation is drowning under a tidal wave of imported people.

Do you think, for example, a black African nation would welcome 500,000 white Britons turning up tomorrow, all penniless, saying "house me and feed me"?

Only in the West have we created a false demigod of immigration, insisting that it is somehow enriching and beneficial in its own right, that the fruits of it will always be good.

Most other nations are not so stupid, they are much more pro emigration than pro immigration. When it comes to people immigrating to their country, they wish to be selective in both numbers and quality (in terms of usefulness to the society, similarity to the existing culture and people etc) of the immigrants.

They have not conditioned their people to believe that opposing immigration, that wishing to retain an identity as a people, is a racist act of hate.

We in the West have taught our people just that. You must welcome all, in whatever numbers, and embrace them. Our nation is their nation, they have a right to come in vast waves which takes precedence over any rights of ours.

Even the quality of the immigrant is not allowed to be considered. We must take them and support them no matter what, no questions asked, even if they contribute nothing and indeed even if they actively agitate for the destruction of the Britain we know.

Think otherwise and you are racist, immigration is always good.

Only the West has abandoned any concept of 'protectionism' when it comes to immigration, only the West refuses to ask "where is the benefit to us".

For the politicians it may be a distant problem here as in other countries, they don't have to live in the crime riddled districts of their nation which have become enclaves of a foreign land. They'll not find themselves out of a job in their own lifetimes because immigrants will work more cheaply.

But, for the people, it is a problem daily, and the peoples of many nations realise this.

People the world over are rightfully disturbed at the prospect of colonisation, and rightly so - the mass immigration of the twenty first century will be a domino effect.

Today it is Britain, and other western EU nations, turn - tomorrow, as economies collapse, as populations far exceed the capacity of a nation to support them, 'hideously diverse' peoples will set out from those nations to begin the cycle elsewhere.

Todays exporter of people will find themselves tomorrows mass importer, their culture too will become a multicultural morass as a result of the invasion called immigration.

As well as bringing a huge raft of problems, mass immigration destroys identity, and who can blame these nations and peoples for wishing to retain theirs?

The only criticism which could justifiably be levelled is that many of them want it both ways, to protect their own identity, but for their people to be able to emigrate en masse and thus damage another nations identity.

This artificially encouraged and created mass immigration which is the hallmark of modern times will, eventually, result in the displacement of all peoples, changing populations and demographics beyond recognition across the board.

Destruction may come to the West first, but - whether we decide it is a globalist conspiracy to destroy the bonds which hold all nations together, or simply the inevitable result of an idiotic desire among officialdom to create diversity for diversities sake - all nations will find themselves on the receiving end sooner or later.

The people will not benefit, and people in many countries are waking up to the truth, that mass immigration brings little in the way of benefits and a lot in the way of problems.

Many people in a multitude of countries realise also that things are only going to get worse if we all carry on the way that we are heading. They are getting their foretaste of what has been inflicted upon the West, and they don't like it.

Who can blame them for that?

Well, it took someone born in Lahore to say it – probably the only way to escape the accusations of racism that would pour in thick and fast if anyone else spoke out – but Baroness Shreela Flather has stated a truth that we’ve all known, and many of us have warned about, for years.

Some foreigners – and she singles out Pakistanis and Bangladeshis – are having more children because it brings them benefits and a bigger house.

“The minority communities in this country, particularly the Pakistanis and the Bangladeshis, have a very large number of children and the attraction is the large number of benefits that follow the child....Nobody likes to accept that, nobody likes to talk about it because it is supposed to be very politically incorrect”.

Just one rephrase, nobody is allowed to talk about that, cries of racism are what would greet our words. It’s not that people don’t like to, it’s that the PC system has stifled all debate.

You’ll put them in a tricky position though, a peer born in Lahore mentioning Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. They’ll probably just bury it without a mention, the racism card would be a tough one to play.

Many of us have been saying it for years though, we have seen huge families subsidised by the British taxpayer, watched as in effect we pay for our own colonisation.

The perfect system was created for immigrants to have children like it was going out of fashion, where they would be rewarded for this, and by God have many taken advantage of Britain’s stupidity.

It is by no coincidence that we see birth rates falling among the indigenous, yet going through the roof for certain minority groups – we’ve handed them every incentive.

Britain has, quite simply, encouraged peoples from the world over to settle here, and once here has given them every encouragement to raise huge families.

We hand reward after reward to our colonisers, and we are forbidden from saying a thing about it because to do so would be racist.

As for doing anything about it, well, racist too, there’s the EHRC and human rights waiting in the wings.

Who can really blame the immigrants, it is the idiocy of those who subverted the system into a politically correct monolith pandering to every minority need which has led us to here.

A moronic system which functions to impose diversity and the decline of the indigenous, that’s exactly what we have in the UK.

Thinking that foreign cultures would suddenly adapt to British ways and have miniscule families, especially when there are financial incentives to breed like rabbits, is symptomatic of the ludicrous idea of integration which has been foisted on us.

It is not by accident that the system was created whereby we were forced to allow millions into Britain, and then we handed them every incentive to raise huge families, it was a deliberate move and part of the attempts to create a multicultural society.

We witnessed a perfect storm of immigration, encouragement to immigrants to have large families, and it being taboo for the British people to speak of it.

Those conditions did not occur by accident, nor do they remain in place by accident.

Benefits and babies are another arm in the colonisation of the UK, we’re paying the costs incurred along the way to our own demise as a people.

The population of Britains humble ladybird is in decline - thanks to an invasion of Asian harlequin ladybirds, who not only compete for food but now have been proven to actually eat the British ladybird.

Research has shown that, in some areas, over a 3 year period the harlequin ladybird rose from 0.1% of the population to around 40%. During the same period the British species of ladybird halved.

First arriving in Southern England seven years ago, the harlequins spread has been explosive, now being found as far afield as the north and Scotland.

"How the rise of harlequins will affect UK ecosystems, apart from that we can expect to see less of our native ladybirds and more of the harlequin, still remains unknown" said Dr Andrew Salisbury of the Royal Horticultural Society.

One foreign population increases at the expense of the local population, competes for limited resources, and the numbers of the indigenous species dwindle.

Soon the native species is a minority, pushed into terminal decline, forced out of its own habitat and walking the road to becoming rarity or extinction.

Anyone else see any interesting parallels there?

Twin figures out today show the extent to which Britain is labouring under a mass influx of immigrants and is rapidly becoming a colonised nation, where foreign workers are taking the jobs, and where immigrant births are rapidly outstripping those of our own people.

We've warned on this site before of colonisation by the cradle and the astoundingly high number of births among immigrants in Britain - todays figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) prove it.

25.1% of children born in the UK in 2010 were born to migrants, 181,514 children from a total of 723,165 newborns.

This has shown an alarming rise decade on decade. For 2000 it was 15.5%, and in 1990 it stood at 11.6%.

As an example of the pressure which is placing on services across the board, the Royal College of Midwives has recently warned that 4,700 new midwives are needed to handle the increase. Across the board the costs and burdens are immense.

Just a few days ago we saw figures from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development reveal that Britain is the number one destination in Europe for immigrants to settle permanently.

In the entire world only America, of course blessed with having a vastly larger land mass than the UK, received more permanent immigrants than us.

379,000 foreigners settled here in 2009, a 14% rise on the previous year, coming at a time when most other countries witnessed a drop in immigrants settling permanently.

Population growth, driven by twin factors of immigration and children born to immigrants, is completely unsustainable at anything like the rates we are witnessing.

Also out, again from the Office for National Statistics, are statistics for the number of foreign workers occupying jobs in the UK.

Currently standing at just over 4 million, a rise of 334,000 on the previous year, and coming on top of the revelation that a full 81% of new jobs in Britain went to foreign workers, it is clear that the British worker is being forced out of the British jobs market.

With unemployment standing at an official 2.45million people in the 3 months til May, it is impossible not to see the link with foreign labour occupying job vacancies nor the absurdity of continuing to import more workers to enter a jobs market where there is already a devastatingly high number of people unemployed.

The whole situation is destructive to Britain and the British people. Our economy is in ruins, we import more people and impose more burdens. There is a housing and a jobs shortage, so we import more people to occupy what little we have. We head towards overpopulation at a rate which will lead to national collapse and we sow the seeds for even greater population increases in years to come.

The British workplace, the British schoolyard, the British maternity ward, and nearly every other facet of national life, all are fast becoming places where the British people are pushed aside, a part of Britain that is more foreign than British.