|
|---|
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
The results of a poll carried out by Ipsos KMG, has revealed the interesting fact that 61% of Turks think that there are too many immigrants in their country.
Only 21% of those polled - and the survey was conducted in 24 countries including the USA and Germany - believed that immigrants have a positive effect on their country. In Turkey, only 6% of Turks polled believed immigrants had a positive effect on their country.
With Turkey heading for EU membership, vigorously supported by the likes of David Cameron, and many warning that should Turkey become a member the West will be swamped with Muslim immigrants, it's worth reflecting upon mass immigration and some simple truths around it.
For the most part - at least after a certain point/other than under some circumstances - countries wish to export people, not import them.
It's fine if their people go overseas and colonise someone elses land, but they do not wish to see their own nation become some foreign outpost where they are a minority.
There's nothing wrong with wanting to preserve your own culture, traditions, and race, it's a natural thing.
Of course, here in the West officialdom presents it differently. For some groups - such as the indigenous British - to wish to preserve themselves and their identity is labelled racist and xenophobic, other groups and nations we'll turn a blind eye to or even support.
The great hypocrisy of mass immigration is simply that many of the non-Western countries who believe that their own people should be free to move wherever, do so only until they are on the receiving end of huge influxes of people foreign to them and all of the attendant problems that brings.
They will swamp other nations with their people, but they do not want to see their own nation swamped with outsiders.
Some nations export people, some import them. Most of the exporters are wise enough to realise that mass immigration is only a good thing when they are not the ones whose nation is drowning under a tidal wave of imported people.
Do you think, for example, a black African nation would welcome 500,000 white Britons turning up tomorrow, all penniless, saying "house me and feed me"?
Only in the West have we created a false demigod of immigration, insisting that it is somehow enriching and beneficial in its own right, that the fruits of it will always be good.
Most other nations are not so stupid, they are much more pro emigration than pro immigration. When it comes to people immigrating to their country, they wish to be selective in both numbers and quality (in terms of usefulness to the society, similarity to the existing culture and people etc) of the immigrants.
They have not conditioned their people to believe that opposing immigration, that wishing to retain an identity as a people, is a racist act of hate.
We in the West have taught our people just that. You must welcome all, in whatever numbers, and embrace them. Our nation is their nation, they have a right to come in vast waves which takes precedence over any rights of ours.
Even the quality of the immigrant is not allowed to be considered. We must take them and support them no matter what, no questions asked, even if they contribute nothing and indeed even if they actively agitate for the destruction of the Britain we know.
Think otherwise and you are racist, immigration is always good.
Only the West has abandoned any concept of 'protectionism' when it comes to immigration, only the West refuses to ask "where is the benefit to us".
For the politicians it may be a distant problem here as in other countries, they don't have to live in the crime riddled districts of their nation which have become enclaves of a foreign land. They'll not find themselves out of a job in their own lifetimes because immigrants will work more cheaply.
But, for the people, it is a problem daily, and the peoples of many nations realise this.
People the world over are rightfully disturbed at the prospect of colonisation, and rightly so - the mass immigration of the twenty first century will be a domino effect.
Today it is Britain, and other western EU nations, turn - tomorrow, as economies collapse, as populations far exceed the capacity of a nation to support them, 'hideously diverse' peoples will set out from those nations to begin the cycle elsewhere.
Todays exporter of people will find themselves tomorrows mass importer, their culture too will become a multicultural morass as a result of the invasion called immigration.
As well as bringing a huge raft of problems, mass immigration destroys identity, and who can blame these nations and peoples for wishing to retain theirs?
The only criticism which could justifiably be levelled is that many of them want it both ways, to protect their own identity, but for their people to be able to emigrate en masse and thus damage another nations identity.
This artificially encouraged and created mass immigration which is the hallmark of modern times will, eventually, result in the displacement of all peoples, changing populations and demographics beyond recognition across the board.
Destruction may come to the West first, but - whether we decide it is a globalist conspiracy to destroy the bonds which hold all nations together, or simply the inevitable result of an idiotic desire among officialdom to create diversity for diversities sake - all nations will find themselves on the receiving end sooner or later.
The people will not benefit, and people in many countries are waking up to the truth, that mass immigration brings little in the way of benefits and a lot in the way of problems.
Many people in a multitude of countries realise also that things are only going to get worse if we all carry on the way that we are heading. They are getting their foretaste of what has been inflicted upon the West, and they don't like it.
Who can blame them for that?
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
It's also, despite some last minute hand wringing among government ministers currently ongoing, looking likely to soon become a member of the EU, perhaps as early as 2013 if some supporters get their way.
Part of the concern is the impact which Turkeys full accession into the EU, complete with the freedom of movement among EU nations which that will hand to the Turkish people, will have on Turkish immigration into other EU states.
Various estimates predict the flow of Turkish nationals into other EU states will be anywhere between 60,000 at the low end, up to 4.4 million at the high end. Currently, there are already 150,000 Turkish nationals living in Britain.
One thing we should remember with estimates on population movement when countries join up fully to the EU is the debacle which occurred when Poland and other east European countries joined up in 2004.
Back then we were told annual net migration of 13,000 was expected - politicians have a habit of spinning things whichever way they think will put the public at ease. The reality is that from Poland alone we now have in excess of 500,000 people living in the UK.
Whatever figures the politicians choose to present us about Turkey will prove to be exactly the same, a total miscalculation and underestimate.
Whichever figures turn out to be accurate, and it is unlikely to be the lowest estimates as history proves, given the problems which Britain and many EU nations face with an Islam which refuses to integrate, one might question whether it is really wise to allow a predominantly Muslim nations people the right of free movement around the EU.
Yet another concern is the fact that Turkeys membership would extend the EU's borders so that a land border would be shared with countries such as Iraq, Iran, and Syria.
Turkeys land border with Greece is a major channel of illegal immigration into the EU, as well as one of the major routes for heroin being smuggled into Europe.
With Turkey becoming a full EU member its shared borders with numerous turbulent states would instantly provide residents of those troubled countries with a single land border which they could cross in order to arrive in an EU nation.
We would see the number of people from those countries such as Iraq who could make it into the EU seeking asylum rise by a staggering rate.
However, that hasn't stopped the usual suspects pushing for Turkeys admission into the EU to be speeded up.
David Cameron is distinctly in favour of Turkeys membership, indeed promising to fight for it it, and claiming to be angered at the slow pace of negotiations.
So is Dave Milliband, who said in 2009 that "I am very clear that Turkish accession to the EU is important and will be of huge benefit to both Turkey and the EU".
Just what benefit handing tens of millions of Muslims free movement around a Europe already struggling with many problems with Islamic integration will be seems to have been left unanswered, indeed many might consider that such a move could well be disastrous.
For the UK, already suffering with utterly unsustainable population growth thanks to huge levels of immigration, and increasingly seeing the results of an Islam which is growing in both strength and numbers and exhibiting a growing willingness to flex its muscles on our streets, one might well be forgiven for thinking that any benefits might well seem minor compared to the increased issues and compounding of existing problems which Turkeys full membership will bring.
Turkeys full presence within the EU will indeed be an unmitigated disaster and will, among other things, serve to further increase the problems which we in the West face from an Islam which will not integrate but which continues to grow in numbers.
The expansionist EU, ever keen to get new members for its club of nations, does so without regard to the issues which it will cause to us in the West, and pays no attention to the destructive effects that trying to reduce sovereign nations to some kind of USA type states under central rule will have on the people and cultures of Europe.
