Muammar Al Khadafi

Further details of the ethnic makeup of the rioters who set Britains cities ablaze in an orgy of destruction and looting are emerging as Ministry of Justice and Home Office reports look into the backgrounds of those arrested.

We'll let that champion of all diverse, and cheerleader for a multicultural Britain, The Guardian speak for us to begin with.

Coming from them - and one can imagine some poor Guardian editor nervously chewing his pencil and wondering if there was any way to spin this into a positive light before giving up and just deciding to write cold, hard facts - this carries a weight and savage indictment all of its own :

The analysis of the ethnic backgrounds of those brought before the courts for riot-related offences varied significantly from the local population, with 42% of defendants white and 46% black. Only 7% were Asian.

The ethnic composition of court defendants was particularly different from the local area profile in three places: Haringey in north London, where 55% of defendants were black compared with 17% of young people locally; Nottingham, where 62% of defendants were black compared with 9% locally; and Birmingham, where 46% of defendants were black compared with 9% of young people locally.*

And the powers that be still deny that race played a factor in these riots?

Black people making up 9% of the population in an area, yet 62% of those arrested - that is a very telling figure, although of course the left will blame deprivation or better yet racism for it. So many blacks were arrested because of those nasty, racist policemen, not because so many blacks were rioting.

What is clear to read there is one of two things happening - either that 9% black in an area were hugely over represented among the rioters, or that blacks from outside these areas descended on the locale. Or most likely both. Either way, there's really no positive light can be put on it by those who preach the illusions of multiculturalism and some wonderfully harmonious and integrated society.

We can say, quite simply and without risk of refutation - although of course we'll be shouted down as racist for saying it - that although people of all ethnicities were involved in the riots, blacks were considerably more involved than any other ethnicity, both as a total and when considered against their percentage of the population as a whole.

Whether blacks began the riots is a whole other question, but they certainly got on board and joined in when the opportunity presented itself. In terms of numbers, they made the riots their own so to speak. When it came to criminal activities they needed no help to integrate themselves.

What came after is the inevitable result of mass third world immigration - criminality, cities burning, and areas of a first world nation becoming more like some chaotic suburb of a wartorn third world country like Somalia.

The riots are just the most visible example of the truth - that this nightmarish mess is what those who have thrown our borders open, and who continue to leave them open, have created.

This is Britains multicultural harmony, with blazing cities marking its progress, and the future will see yet more burn. Heaven help us all.

* Guardian article - Here

Overpopulation and an increasing UK population have been mentioned in several recent articles here recently, a little further investigation backed up with some figures seemed in order.

Britains population is predicted to hit 78 million by 2051 according to research carried out by the University of Leeds. That would be an increase of around 20 million people from the 2001 census which put our population at just below 59 million people.

Official estimates say that we'll hit 70 million people by 2029, many suspect we will get there much sooner.

The Leeds University report also points to the fact that by the middle of this century as many as 1 in 5 of the population will be an ethnic minority, compared to 1 in 10 at the turn of the century.

A 2007 publication by the Parliament Office of Science and Technology informs us that "BME groups now account for 73% of the UK’s total population growth, due to differences in fertility rates and some inward migration."

73% of population growth down to BME, and that was back in 2007. As BME population as a whole increases, so will that percentage.

Religion also appears to play a part, as the following graph (click to enlarge) taken from an UPTAP/University of Oxford/ESRC 2009 report called "Fertility, ethnicity and religion : recent trends in the UK" shows.

Muslim women are clearly shown to have a far higher fertility rate than any other religious grouping.

On an ethnicity basis, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women aged 25-29 exhibit almost double the fertility rate of white British women in the same age group.

The same UPTAP report delivers us a warning that "with stable flow of migration by ethnic groups the UK-born proportion of the main ethnic minorities will increase".

In other words, White Britains march towards minority in a colonised land will continue unabated. Should fertility rates hold constant then even if immigration were halted tomorrow it would only delay our becoming a minority in our own nation.

Should we wish to look at a specific example then Lambeth will serve our purpose.

Lambeth Councils "Ethnic Monitoring of School Pupils: Guidance for Data Collection in Lambeth" publication informs us that :

"The vast majority (over 73%) of Lambeth’s school population are from black and other ethnic minority groups. The largest groups are English/Scottish/Welsh at 23.6%, followed by Caribbean at 22.8%, African at 22.1%, Other Black at 11%, Other White at 7.2%, Portuguese at 4.6%, Bangladeshi at 1.8%, Indian at 1.5%, Pakistani at 1.3%, Irish at 1.3%, Chinese at 1%, Vietnamese at 0.8%, Turkish at 0.6% and Greek at 0.6%."

The schoolyard is where the changing population makeup is most evident, as these children grow up and have children of their own we will become a minority across the board.

We can clearly see from where the population increase is coming. Schools did not have this ethnic makeup 20 or 30 years ago, it is an obvious fact that numerous additions of "BME/other ethnic minority" people has (and is) taking place in our society.

Schools in other areas may not be as 'enriched', but figures are still high and increasing at a rapid rate. Bristol, for example, recently reported 32% of primary school pupils and 29% of secondary school pupils as being black/minority ethnic.

Leaving births aside, immigration to the UK continues at record levels, hovering around the 200,000 a year mark. 3 million immigrants (just the ones we know about!) have arrived here between 1997 and 2010.

Current projections, according to Migrationwatch, say that immigration will add 7 million to the UK's population inside the next 25 years. That's seven times the population of Birmingham.

Without the pressures imposed by immigration and immigrant birth rates, population would be relatively static, and most certainly not increasing at these unsustainable rates.

Instead, we see an ever growing population, rendering us one of the must overcrowded nations in Europe, and adding additional burdens to infrastructure which is already stretched to breaking point.

We head towards minority status on an overcrowded island, via the border and the cradle we become a colonised land.

Related Information :

Parliament Office of Science and Technology, Ethnicity and Health 2007 - Here

UPTAP/University of Oxford Fertility, ethnicity and religion : recent trends in the UK - Here

Lambeth Council Ethnic Monitoring of School Pupils : Guidance for Data Collection in Lambeth - Here

A survey carried out by the Association of Retail Landlords (ARLA) has suggested that Britain is running out of residential rental properties.

The survey revealed that 74% of ARLA members who responded said that demand was outstripping supply in the private rental sector, the highest level since records began.

At the same time, the number of new homes being built is also at an historic low, with only 134,000 properties built in the UK in 2010.

The National Housing Federation (NHF) has warned that private sector rents may increase by as much as 19.8% over the next five years.

A ruined economy plays its part, but we have also to consider the most obvious burden placed on housing, and other sections of our critical infrastructure, namely our increasing population.

We've a school place shortage, and now we find we are facing a housing shortage.

Prices of rental properties will increase quite simply because of demand, too many people are competing to obtain housing in a finite market.

For the same reason we have seen wages kept artificially low - too many workers in a marketplace where there are finite jobs.

Average people lose out in all ways when the population increases at a pace with which a nation cannot cope, more people impose increasing demands on every aspect of national existence.

The heaviest weight of the burden caused by overpopulation falls squarely on the poorest in society, faced with increasing rents, lower wages, reduced job security, an endless list of costs and hardships.

Yet, despite all these shortages, over population - due to mass immigration and immigrant birth rates - is the obvious fact which all mainstream politicians ignore, we continue to allow people into Britain at an alarming rate.

These hundreds of thousands arriving each year need somewhere to live, jobs - or income via benefits, school places for children, medical care, and every other resource of which we are now discovering we don't have enough of to cope with the existing population let alone support countless additional people.

We have to face the truth - that a population cannot expand rapidly and indefinitely. It is limited by room and resources, no matter how we fool ourselves that is a simple fact.

As we near the point where room and resources are exhausted we see hugely increasing costs and shortages as demand on resources grows beyond all possible hope of supply, and then we hit the point of collapse.

Even if we increase the availability of resources - eg build more houses - we only delay the inevitable, we cannot forever continue increasing resources, and even if we could we're still limited by land mass available to us.

The longer we dither in facing the truth, the worse the situation we will find ourselves in and the more difficult it will be to fix. Absolute disaster awaits all the people in Britain if we blindly continue down this road.

A massive shortage of school places is leading to emergency measures in order to accommodate ever increasing numbers of pupils.

Among areas hit hard and considering emergency measures are Bristol, Gloucester, Dorset, Reading, Salford, Hertfordshire, and Devon.

Bristol is looking at providing another 3,000 primary school places over the next 5 years.

Nationwide, measures including creating emergency classrooms from other buildings are being considered, as well as something interestingly described as "time phased working" for some schools.

Time phased working would see one group of pupils attend school in the mornings, another group of pupils attend school in the afternoons. Part time schooling in other words, not only leaving the child less time in education but also causing difficulties for many working parents.

The cause, as ever, is increasing population and birth rates. Official figures project that we will need an additional 540,000 primary school places nationally by 2018, based on an increase of 14% in the number of primary pupils.

It's a simple fact that, as population increases, either we acquire more resources or the resources we have are stretched further and further with people having less access to them.

In the case of schools we see the desperate need to build more, and the idea being mooted of part time schooling, one might even go so far as to say it is in fact educational rationing being suggested and implemented.

Behind the ever increasing are the twin banes of mass immigration and immigrant driven birth rates. It is not the indigenous British multiplying at such a huge rate that their offspring are outstripping available school places.

The cold and simple truth is that immigrants, and the resulting children born to immigrants/early generation descendants, are arriving far faster than the system can cope with.

The problem is compounded by ConDems cutbacks to budgets, but the fact is that even without the cutbacks we'd have reached crunch point at some time. The population is growing far too rapidly for the infrastructure to keep pace.

A population can neither expand indefinitely, nor expand at the rate which ours has been, without massive problems arising as the increased population demands the resources which are expected to be available in Britain.

Schools, on the front line because of huge birth rates among foreign groups, are the first to see it. We get the colonised, overcrowded classroom. The education of all children suffers, we are forced to look at emergency measures like turning a shop into a classroom or part time schooling just to cope with the massive increase in children.

As population increases - and it will continue to do so, there is no sign that ConDem will get a handle on immigration, nor that immigrant birth rates will drop to mirror those of the indigenous any time soon - we will see more and more of this.

Standards and availability of resources will drop, there is simply no other possible outcome. Our school system, and indeed our nation as a whole, simply cannot cope with the rapidly expanding population forced upon us by the artificially imposed factor of mass immigration.

Unless we halt this population expansion, initially by closing our borders and ending the flood of mass immigration inflicted upon us, we will see the situation continue to worsen.

It may not be a worry to MP's, hidden in their ivory towers and whose children are in some private school, but the rest of us will watch our children be educated in overcrowded, under-resourced classrooms and see our childrens educations suffer.

This is the situation in which mass immigration places us, watching as the education system collapses due to being over-burdened by a massive population increase.

It is our children who will lose out as a result, denied the chance for the best education we could possibly afford them.

David Levin, vice chair of the Headmasters and Headmistresses Conference (HMC), who grew up in South Africa under the apartheid system, has warned that schools in London are 'sleepwalking' into segregation, where some classrooms are exclusively black or Asian.

Mentioned was Stepney Green School, East London, where 97% of pupils are of Bangladeshi heritage.

It's an interesting point, but it isn't a surprise, we all already knew it was happening, and it's not just in schools.

The schools are representative of what happens across the capital, and elsewhere, where we see parallel foreign populations, not the integration that politicians always prattle on about.

The schools are our future, we can see it around us now, but when all these kids grow up they'll join their segregated lands, their foreign communities within our nation.

People do not come to Britain and become British, the evidence of our own eyes tells us that they come to Britain and transform parts of Britain into their homeland.

These parallel communities may overlap in places, but the simple truth is that they are separate communities, they are a part of Britain made foreign, and wishing to remain foreign. Birds of a feather flock together as the old saying goes.

Integration does not occur on any large scale, it was always the pipe dream of idiot politicians that it would.

The sheer size of foreign populations suddenly transplanted here, and the speed at which it happened (and is happening), guaranteed that illusions of integration were doomed to fail from the start.

Indeed, the only real integration going on is not foreign populations integrating with the British, but rather the British being forced to integrate with the demands of the foreign populations.

A nation which is no longer a nation, rather a series of enclaves for other nations, is the result which we see.

Should it continue to its inevitable conclusion then the obliteration of all that is British, and of the British people, is the result.

Minority seeks to become majority, it does it in small doses and confined spaces - that's no criticism, that is perfectly understandable and natural. It makes an area its own.

Only, minority met idiot Britain, which insists minority has to be appeased, that minority is right, that minority must retain its separate identity, and that the indigenous British must surrender their own identity in order to accommodate minority.

The creation of a Britain which is no more than a series of balkanised regions, or cantons, of disparate racial or religious groups, is the result, a state in which the indigenous are strangers on the periphery in their own land.

David Levin's comment on schools, whereas being interesting, is not truly accurate.

We did sleepwalk into segregation - only balkanisation or colonisation would be a more accurate term - and it's not a case of we're getting there, we already are there. And it is not in schools alone.

Schools are a picture of the society around us, a reflection of the present, and an echo of that which is to come.

Segregation is a misleading term, so is apartheid, what we have is the destruction of Britain as a state which has a national identity, and the creation of colony outposts.

We have, to put it simply, invasion. Our invaders are the entire world, and all are making a piece of us theirs.

At best we remain a nation on paper, there is no segregation, there is no apartheid - unless you count groups conspiring to dominate the local populace - there is simply disparate interests all grabbing their piece of the pie, and seeking to remain them whilst we cease to be us.

The results of a poll carried out by Ipsos KMG, has revealed the interesting fact that 61% of Turks think that there are too many immigrants in their country.

Only 21% of those polled - and the survey was conducted in 24 countries including the USA and Germany - believed that immigrants have a positive effect on their country. In Turkey, only 6% of Turks polled believed immigrants had a positive effect on their country.

With Turkey heading for EU membership, vigorously supported by the likes of David Cameron, and many warning that should Turkey become a member the West will be swamped with Muslim immigrants, it's worth reflecting upon mass immigration and some simple truths around it.

For the most part - at least after a certain point/other than under some circumstances - countries wish to export people, not import them.

It's fine if their people go overseas and colonise someone elses land, but they do not wish to see their own nation become some foreign outpost where they are a minority.

There's nothing wrong with wanting to preserve your own culture, traditions, and race, it's a natural thing.

Of course, here in the West officialdom presents it differently. For some groups - such as the indigenous British - to wish to preserve themselves and their identity is labelled racist and xenophobic, other groups and nations we'll turn a blind eye to or even support.

The great hypocrisy of mass immigration is simply that many of the non-Western countries who believe that their own people should be free to move wherever, do so only until they are on the receiving end of huge influxes of people foreign to them and all of the attendant problems that brings.

They will swamp other nations with their people, but they do not want to see their own nation swamped with outsiders.

Some nations export people, some import them. Most of the exporters are wise enough to realise that mass immigration is only a good thing when they are not the ones whose nation is drowning under a tidal wave of imported people.

Do you think, for example, a black African nation would welcome 500,000 white Britons turning up tomorrow, all penniless, saying "house me and feed me"?

Only in the West have we created a false demigod of immigration, insisting that it is somehow enriching and beneficial in its own right, that the fruits of it will always be good.

Most other nations are not so stupid, they are much more pro emigration than pro immigration. When it comes to people immigrating to their country, they wish to be selective in both numbers and quality (in terms of usefulness to the society, similarity to the existing culture and people etc) of the immigrants.

They have not conditioned their people to believe that opposing immigration, that wishing to retain an identity as a people, is a racist act of hate.

We in the West have taught our people just that. You must welcome all, in whatever numbers, and embrace them. Our nation is their nation, they have a right to come in vast waves which takes precedence over any rights of ours.

Even the quality of the immigrant is not allowed to be considered. We must take them and support them no matter what, no questions asked, even if they contribute nothing and indeed even if they actively agitate for the destruction of the Britain we know.

Think otherwise and you are racist, immigration is always good.

Only the West has abandoned any concept of 'protectionism' when it comes to immigration, only the West refuses to ask "where is the benefit to us".

For the politicians it may be a distant problem here as in other countries, they don't have to live in the crime riddled districts of their nation which have become enclaves of a foreign land. They'll not find themselves out of a job in their own lifetimes because immigrants will work more cheaply.

But, for the people, it is a problem daily, and the peoples of many nations realise this.

People the world over are rightfully disturbed at the prospect of colonisation, and rightly so - the mass immigration of the twenty first century will be a domino effect.

Today it is Britain, and other western EU nations, turn - tomorrow, as economies collapse, as populations far exceed the capacity of a nation to support them, 'hideously diverse' peoples will set out from those nations to begin the cycle elsewhere.

Todays exporter of people will find themselves tomorrows mass importer, their culture too will become a multicultural morass as a result of the invasion called immigration.

As well as bringing a huge raft of problems, mass immigration destroys identity, and who can blame these nations and peoples for wishing to retain theirs?

The only criticism which could justifiably be levelled is that many of them want it both ways, to protect their own identity, but for their people to be able to emigrate en masse and thus damage another nations identity.

This artificially encouraged and created mass immigration which is the hallmark of modern times will, eventually, result in the displacement of all peoples, changing populations and demographics beyond recognition across the board.

Destruction may come to the West first, but - whether we decide it is a globalist conspiracy to destroy the bonds which hold all nations together, or simply the inevitable result of an idiotic desire among officialdom to create diversity for diversities sake - all nations will find themselves on the receiving end sooner or later.

The people will not benefit, and people in many countries are waking up to the truth, that mass immigration brings little in the way of benefits and a lot in the way of problems.

Many people in a multitude of countries realise also that things are only going to get worse if we all carry on the way that we are heading. They are getting their foretaste of what has been inflicted upon the West, and they don't like it.

Who can blame them for that?

Surprise, surprise, and not even a Cilla to come waltzing down and sing us a song. Figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) have shown a 21% increase in immigration to the UK in 2010.



Instead of 198,000 in 2009 under Labours insane let em all in policy, we got 239,000 under ConDems 'tough' - read muscular sounding but castrated - watch. They'll pass the buck to Labour, isn't politics just a game of pass the parcel, but part of this is on ConDem's watch.



It makes an utter mockery of ConDem's pledge to reduce mass immigration to the 10s of thousands by 2015. It won't happen! It sounds great as a pledge and a nice bit of headline grabbing soundbite to appease the British people, but like all those other pledges it is not going to happen.



We are - and will remain - a nation swollen to bursting point by continuing mass immigration, the politicians pathetic attempts (or attempts to look like they are doing something) to pretend our borders have any meaning now is like King Canute holding back the ocean, only at least he genuinely believed he had a chance and wasn't just playing to public opinion.



"These figures lay bare the legacy of the Labour government" said Sir Andrew Green of Migrationwatch.



That they do, but it is a legacy eagerly embraced and continued by ConDem, they are all birds of the same feather. Immigration, diversity, colonisation, the big three stand for each of those, only the rhetoric and the who and how will change.



It doesn't matter which of them is in power, which glib politician is telling us that they will do something - they won't, they just say that because they have to say it, it's all part of the political game which will always see the same problems continue whoever among the establishment is voted in.



Back in July we covered the fall in Polands population since their accession to full EU status - their population has dropped by 2 million, whereas the number of Poles in the UK has increased from 95,000 in 2004 to 521,000 in September 2010. Anyone see a link there?



Anyone want to take a bet that we'd see similar comparisons in many of the other 'newer' members of the EU, or that we'll see the same in say Turkey should they win membership?



Where are these people? They are here, it is that simple.



Our population continues to rise, thanks in most part to immigration and immigrant originated births, other countries witness an actual fall in their populations as many of the younger, start a family age, population end up here.



"Before the election, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats said immigration was out of control; afterwards, they said they would cut it dramatically. Neither was true" said Matt Cavanagh of the Institute for Policy Research (IPPR).



Of course it wasn't true, they can't cut immigration, and they won't. Between their own idiotic obsession with creating a mutlicultural utopia, adherence to EU freedom of movement, and an insane devotion to human rights, we are, and - unless someone with genuine courage is elected - always will be a magnet for mass immigration.



We have no control of our borders, the politicians may as well be honest about it. The politicians will do nothing save for mutter a few tough words as a sop to public opinion. When it comes to immigration they are eunuchs.



ConDem have promised a crackdown on immigration - absolutely nothing will come of it!.



Labour, now in opposition, make some tokenistic comments about recognising their mistakes - nothing will come of it!



A vote for any of them is a vote for the continuation of mass immigration, not one of them has a single policy that will do anything about it, other than perhaps changing the nation/s from which we end up receiving most immigrants.



We vote for them, we vote for more migrants. They will not, and indeed cannot unless they radically changed their commitments to many 'ideals', do a thing.



Mass immigration is a given under the lot of them. We've just seen the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats in action, nothing changed since Labour. After Labours decade of open borders, well, would you trust them on immigration, or on anything else for that matter?



This is the reality which we face for so long as we go on electing the usual suspects.



Mass immigration into the UK will continue unabated, British jobs will go to foreign workers, the benefits system will pander to the foreigner, and our population will continue to grow to an unsustainable level.



Don't believe us on it, look around you. That's what you're getting when voting for Lib/Lab/Con, nothing changes whatsoever, mass immigration is a constant factor.



Can we even support the people here now, are there enough jobs, houses, resources in the health service and everything else?



You know the answer, and it's only going to get worse. You cannot trust the big three parties on immigration, they're all reading off the same script.



Mass immigration is here to stay until we change that, the politicians among Lib/Lab/Con are not going to do a damn thing.



The sooner Britain wakes up to that and votes accordingly the better, because this cannot carry on forever without utter catastrophe for Britain being the result - and the catastrophe already here is painful enough.

The huge burden placed on the social housing system by new immigrants will cost the UK taxpayer £1 billion a year for the next 25 years, and will require that 45 new homes are built every day just to accommodate our colonisers.

As well as this, statistics revealed by Migrationwatch show the hugely disproportionate drain upon the housing system which some groups represent.

Whereas 17% of the UK born (which one would presume also includes minorities born in the UK) occupy social housing, for some other groups those figures skyrocket.

For Iranian and Jamaican born people living in Britain, the figures are 33% and 35% respectively, around double that for the UK born.

Bangladeshis and Turks living here are 41% and 49% in social housing.

The out and out leader for occupying social housing though? Somalians, of whom a staggering 80% are in social housing, fast approaching 5 times the levels of those born in the UK.

Section 6 of the Migrationwatch report is worth reprinting in full, the statements made there are very telling.

"There are two main reasons for the high rate of tenure for social housing by non-EU migrants people - the relatively high number of those granted refugee status, and the fact that the housing ‘needs’ of migrants from outside Europe are often assessed as higher than others. The latter may be because overcrowding is higher amongst some migrant communities due to their larger family size"

There we have many problems in a nutshell. High levels of immigration. Immigrants having far larger families. And, immigrants needs put higher than others.

A recipe for disaster and colonisation, with the easy availability of housing which we hand to foreigners making Britain attractive to all comers, the huge families - which again we will bend over backwards to accommodate - ensuring future drain on the housing system, and continuing immigration ensuring that the situation only gets worse.

The household size statistics given by Migrationwatch are again revealing - with White British having significantly smaller average household size that nearly every other group listed.

Weighing in at the top of the list for the biggest families? Black Africans, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis. Colonisation by the cradle continues unabated as Britain walks the road towards white minority.

The myriad costs imposed on the British taxpayer as we finance our own colonisation - whether it be financial costs, ever growing social housing waiting lists, or the need to cram more and more housing and people into our small island - are quite simply unacceptable and are realistically unsustainable.

Our nation should never have been placed in this position to begin with, and nor should we remain in it, where Britain is expected to house and support those from the world over.

We cannot afford it, there is no room, and we have no desire to finance the destruction of our society and people, and the creation of some diverse and disparate nightmare.

The signs need to go up - Britain is full, no admission, closed until further notice.

There is no other logical choice if we are to preserve our nation and prevent the spiralling burden imposed by immigration bringing us to collapse and utter ruin.

Migrationwatch Report

A new survey conducted by Ipsos Mori has shown the deep dissatisfaction among members of the public with high levels of immigration, and an increasing awareness of the problems which mass immigration has imposed upon our society.

Seven in ten Britons agreed that there are too many immigrants in the Britain.

Only one in four thought that immigration had been good for the economy, whilst three in five said that mass immigration had made it harder for Britons to get jobs.

Three in four of the 1,000 people polled believed that immigration placed too much pressure on public services.

People are becoming increasingly aware of the burdens which are being placed upon us, the changes bring wrought in our society, and the negative effect which being swamped with immigrants has upon all aspects of our existence.

Our critical services are stretched to breaking point, hardly a day goes by when we don't hear of NHS shortages, struggling schools where childrens education suffers amidst a babble of 50 different languages, rising crime, and a whole host of other issues.

Not to mention we just need to open the papers to see some asylum seeker, who has never contributed a penny, nicely ensconced in a £2,000 a month mansion, all paid for by us.

As for jobs, well, there simply are not enough for the people we already have, unemployment figures prove this. Workers now face lowered wages as a result of a saturated labour market, and not only that they also have to compete against a whole underground of illegal labour.

Mass immigration has been an unmitigated disaster for the British worker, and yet the same old politicians and unions bleat on about how great it all is. It sure isn't for the guy in the factories seeing 50 Eastern European workers in line for his job, if indeed he is lucky enough to still have a job.

We're being faced with having to build houses at a record rate just to try and keep up with the increasing population, shortages of school places, and whole sections of our towns and cities becoming like a part of a foreign nation.

Everyone - other than do gooding liberals, asylum and human rights lawyers making a fortune, and those landing themselves jobs in all of these equalities and rights positions whether it be in quangos or elsewhere - loses. Our nation and our people have been pushed past any sane levels of immigration and into direct colonisation.

No wonder people are getting angry, it is now evident to all but those with a vested interest that officialdom massively oversold us on the benefits of immigration and yet neglected to warn us about the many additional burdens and problems which it would create.

The amazing thing though? People continue to vote for Liberal, Labour, or Tory, and none of those will do a damn thing about it, mass immigration will continue unabated.

Many are now aware of the problem - and the solution does not lie in Lib/Lab/Con, they've all had ample time to prove otherwise and have not only failed to do so but have actually done nothing at all to even take steps in the right direction.

Britain simply cannot take it any more, from here it can only get worse. Unless there is a change in political leadership and people embrace parties who are willing to do something, it can - and will - only get worse.

The people of Britain, be it the worker struggling to find a job and a decent wage to support their family, the child trying to learn in 'diverse' schools, the elderly waiting for operations on the overstretched NHS, or that last old British face hiding behind the curtains of a house in an area that has become a corner of Pakistan, deserve so much better than the Britain we see today.

If you've any doubt about the reality of the ongoing colonisation of Britain, and the nightmarish situation now facing our schools and our children, then let this disabuse you.

"The school is in one of the city’s most deprived areas, and 90 per cent of the 417 pupils are from Pakistan. Many arrive at the school unable to speak a word of English".

Only 4 of the pupils at Bradford Moor Community Primary School speak English as their first language. A staggering 90%, as shown in the quote - taken from the Daily Mail - hail from Pakistan.

It is "not fair on the 1 per cent of children who do speak English because their lessons will be compromised" said Dr David Green of Civitas.

Compromised is an understatement. British children have simply no chance in that environment, they are the marginalised minority, paying a great price in the form of a betrayed future for the 'enrichment' which has been inflicted upon us.

Primary schools are the front line of what is happening to our nation as a whole - colonisation, and the indigenous population driven into marginal and minority status.

What we see in todays primary school is tomorrows secondary school and the day afters workplace. Society is being transformed, and it is being made into a society of indigenous minority.

There is no integration when a minority comes to make up the majority in an area, in this case the schoolyard, there is in fact transformation.

The indigenous are pushed to one side, it is they who are forced to try and integrate into what is, for all intents and purposes, a foreign society existing within, but apart from, our own.

It is a simple truth that, should a nation wish to preserve a cohererent national identity, it cannot do so if some areas see the indigenous made into a hugely outnumbered minority.

Instead, that area will take on the characteristics of the dominant and most numerous people, in this instance Pakistan.

On a pure financial and resources level, our nation cannot withstand this.

On a cultural level, it is absolute suicide. There is no other outcome than our people being replaced, being forced to become a minority and having to try and integrate with parts of Britain which have become a foreign land.

Without a shot being fired we are witnessing areas of Britain become all but territories ceded to foreign nations. It is nothing short of national suicide.

These are bleak days, but it is our children, and our childrens children, who will pay the full price for this madness which has seen our nation and our childrens futures surrendered.